Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESAPRO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-19 12:49Z 

ESAPRO


This is an article made by a single purpose account (one other edit apart from creating this - and that was actually vandalism of another similar article; see here) and is clearly spam. The product itself is not in anyway notable - in fact, I've been in the dietary supplement industry 12 years, working for/with as many as 15-20 different brands, and I've never heard of it (if not for this possible conflict I would have just speedied it myself). Google test reveals 49 results (and most of these aren't about this product at all) - in short; Delete Glen 08:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Addition: I've just looked at the history of this article and noticed its already been deleted twice before as blatant advertising - so now my position has changed; Speedy Delete Glen 08:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. I couldn't find any evidence that this is notable, and I couldn't confirm any of the information. Given the three-times-deleted status, salting the earth would seem appropriate, too. William Pietri 09:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete OR. Xiner (talk, email) 21:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.