Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESTIEM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 03:27, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

ESTIEM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

From prod (declined by the creator): "This articles fails to establish notability, failing Notability (organizations)." Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 18:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Article has sufficient references from secondary sources to make it notable. Inwind (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * O'really? Please list them here and explain what makes those non-primary references mainstream and reliable, as required by WP:RS. The one ref you added doesn't look like either, I am afraid. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 19:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 12:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:41, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:19, 25 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.