Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ETC Bollywood Business


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. The Bushranger One ping only 18:26, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

ETC Bollywood Business

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )



Article about what seems to be a minor channel on Indian cable TV. References are mostly primary or seem to be unreliable, and ghits seem to return mostly self-generated content. I am also concerned because the creator seems to be an SPA that went through WP:AFC  unsuccessfully, so he decided to go ahead and just have a separate account  create it in articlespace (sock?). I am also nominating Zee Khana Khazana Channel, which was rejected repeatedly from AFC and is essentially the same thing. I believe this is WP:PROMO at best, and the channels simply don't seem to meet WP:GNG at least; with no prejudice to withdrawing the AFD if Indian editors with more knowledge about this can provide substantive sources. § FreeRangeFrog 21:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete both Articles' subjects do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH.  Blue Rasberry    (talk)   22:10, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Automatic Strikeout  ( T •  C ) 03:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the network as the reasonable solution. Thee is no justification for removing it completely; WP:Deletion Policy is that redirects are preferred to deletion. so perhaps the nominator can explain why a redirect isn't suitable, as we do for other channels in the Zee  network.  DGG ( talk ) 21:46, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Nowhere did I state that a redirect is not appropriate, and I wasn't aware that we redirect the channel articles to the network. § FreeRangeFrog 22:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:08, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 00:30, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep There still seems to be evidence of notability. DanLancaster (talk) 19:49, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.