Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ETEBAC5 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:52, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

ETEBAC5
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prior AfD closed due to 0 comments. Topic fails WP:GNG. No sources. Nothing. The last sentence ends in ... and seems unfinished. This is worse than a draft. Should have been speedied. Can we delete this, please? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   04:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   04:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - The article has been around for 12 years and shows no sign of being improved or acquiring any sources. As it stands, it appears to fail WP:GNG.PohranicniStraze (talk) 04:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree the article is worse than a draft. The topic is discussed in passing at Electronic Banking Internet Communication Standard which is more than sufficient. Power~enwiki (talk) 06:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with the other two. This article is not notable, already discussed, and not only unhelpful to all those who come across it but also actively hurts Wikipedia. This is essentially a draft that somehow got published and never deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williambellwisdo (talk • contribs) 14:13, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  21:45, 24 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.