Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EURO-World Network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. EURO-World Network closed as keep, additional articles should be nominated seperately. v/r - TP 15:22, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

EURO-World Network

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:CORP as I cannot find any significant secondary coverage. SmartSE (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

This is a co-nomination, along with: They are all part of the same company and I can find no coverage of any of them. SmartSE (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Althought all 4 articles need a lot of work there does look to be some references out there although I do admit that some of them are in foreign langauges I don't understand and some are not what I would consider strong sources. --Kumioko (talk) 20:54, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you provide some links? I searched myself but couldn't find anything beyond passing mentions. SmartSE (talk) 13:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge to EURO-World Network, I'm finding a number of mentions in Google News the other articles are not needed. This can be adequately covered in a single article on the network. RadioFan (talk) 14:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * As above, can you show what you mean by "mentions in google news" - are they enough to meet WP:CORP? SmartSE (talk) 13:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I mean its enough for some coverage in Wikipedia but I'm not seeing enough here to warrant a dedicate article.--RadioFan (talk) 23:50, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment note that the title of this article has been corrected to EUROWorldNetwork RadioFan (talk) 14:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't understand the problem and why all of a sudden this article has been part of Wikipedia for over 2 years and was just recently updated to reflect new & up-to-date information. Please explain to me how this process works and why this is now an issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KC5Bandidos (talk • contribs) 07:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment Sometimes articles escape notice for a while. It might have been patrolled by a new editor.  Lots of reasons.  Notability guidelines apply to all articles, longevity here doesn't give it a pass. RadioFan (talk) 02:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, m.o.p  05:40, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 16:41, 19 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep apparently an internationally distributor of radio programs, and therefore important. It would help to have specific references, but the many very notable stations it distributes are in this case sufficient evidence of notability  DGG ( talk ) 18:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.