Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EU trade disputes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as unsalvageable unsourced original research. If someone wants to create a new article covering the same topic but written in an encyclopedic manner, that won't be a problem. This article was just a mess, however, and would take more effort to rewrite than simply creating a new article. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihon joe 20:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

EU trade disputes
While there is almost certainly an article that could be written on this subject, this is not it. This is just a mishmash of topics almost completely unreferenced and with statements and choices that constitute original research. Indrian 21:03, 5 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep - highly relevant. -- Petri Krohn 01:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Relevance is not the issue, WP:OR is. Indrian 01:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, but needs rewriting and adding references. Beagel 06:52, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - or rename to a better and more encyclopedic title at Economic relations of the European Union. However, in its current state the article resembles an essay by a high school student, therefore might be better to delete and create a seperate article at ER of the EU. Baristarim 23:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article has problems, but it's not so bad that deletion is necessary.  I suggest application of the appropriate tags and lets give it time to evolve.  I do not disagree with Baristarim that another title might not be better, but these are larger editorial issues that can't all get wrapped up in AfD.-- Kubigula (talk) 22:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. A simple rename to Trade disputes in the European Union and some elbow grease will suffice. --Hemlock Martinis 00:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.