Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EVIL (Organization)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 03:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

EVIL (Organization)
Not notable. Apostrophe 00:42, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Delete. If it's so important, someone will post this properly. JHMM13 03:17, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. NSLE  ( 讨论 + extra ) 04:11, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete hoaxy, nn in any case Renata3 06:22, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It may be from Sponge Bob, but is not notable enoguh for an article. Superm401 | Talk 07:59, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fan cruft? IanManka 15:00, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonsense, frankly. Without looking up the links it's not even obvious whether this is fact or fiction. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 17:03, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete because the best evil organization is Montgomery Burns' League of Evil. And also because I think this page has no relevance to anybody except the writer of this page. Croat Canuck 05:02, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Rename to EVIL (Spongebob Squarepants) - all 3 of the people in the organisation are links, and its veried. I don't see how we have a choice here. Zordrac 09:16, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. Stifle 00:08, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into main Spongebob Squarepants article.--Chuckhoffmann 08:07, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.