Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXpressDSP (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus Cool Hand Luke 17:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

EXpressDSP

 * — (View AfD)

Previous AfD was in May 2006. The decision was no concensus, and the article has not been updated since. This article is orphaned and its notability is, in my opinion, very low. Therefore I propose its deletion. -- lucasbfr talk 22:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Topic appears to be notable; article is fairly factual. John Vandenberg 07:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 07:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete article asserts no notability whatsoever, it is merely a description of the software. Mere existence does not confer notability, neither does the article being factual contribute anything to the notability requirement.  Zun aid  ©  ®  09:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertion of notability, boarderline advertisment. --Fang Aili talk 22:24, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Googling convinces me that this is a solid enough thing to keep, and it's by TI. --Gwern (contribs) 20:25 11 January 2007 (GMT) 20:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.