Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagle & Hawk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep  - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Eagle & Hawk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Musical group with no evidence of any notability. Article has been around since 2011 and has been tagged as requiring sources but none have appeared. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 23:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article definitely needs improvement for referencing and writing tone — it's definitely been skewed in a decidedly advertorial direction from the relatively neutral version that was first created in 2008 — but they have won the Juno Award for Indigenous Music Album of the Year, which is a clean pass of WP:NMUSIC #8 (the Junos are even named in NMUSIC #8 as one of the canonical examples of an award that passes it.) Bearcat (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 00:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Nomination withdrawn - in the light of very recent sourcing, article now appears to pass the bar on notability.  Velella  Velella Talk 02:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.