Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagle Building


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 20:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Eagle Building

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Its my own article. I am not shore of this but i dont think it is notable. AlwaysOnion (talk) 17:44, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete You're right. Themfromspace (talk) 17:53, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable. Tatarian (talk) 17:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * G7 Author requested deletion. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Delete Fails notability guidelines entirely.  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Very Weak Keep I am working there and i think it is notable. It is one of the highest working buildings in stockholm and like it is written in the article it owns the skyline in the area. I am new on Wikipedia so i dont know much! Thats why its a week keep. Preklator09 (talk) 18:24, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I don't think being a tall building in Stockholm is enough for notability. Tatarian (talk) 19:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete A twelve floor building, unless there is something spectacularly remarkable about it, is not notable. Mvjs   Talking  09:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.