Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagle Fortress


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Daniel (talk) 03:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Eagle Fortress

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

fails general notability guideline. tagged for notability issues since the month the article was created. ltb d l (talk) 09:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Amusement parks and Korea. ltb d  l (talk) 09:13, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Everland. It's a possible search term, but the article itself isn't worth saving. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Strong keep I may be a bit biased as someone who does South Korean amusement park stuff, but I genuinely believe this is notable. The SIGCOV in RS is definitely there but the sources are all in Korean, thus leading to misconceptions that this is not a notable coaster. A quick search through Naver shows all this coverage:  . Plus older news sources show signs of SIGCOV as well - . #prodraxis  connect 13:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  10:46, 24 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep for same reasons that @Prodraxis provided. Coverage in the Korean language is easily notable. toobigtokale (talk) 02:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.