Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagle Hunter Solutions Limited (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Insufficient sourcing to satisfy WP:NCORP -- RoySmith (talk) 21:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Eagle Hunter Solutions Limited
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article moved from draft space despite issues with unreliable sources (multiple press releases and announcements) and attempts to inherit notability from alleged customers Fails WP:CORP Flat Out (talk) 06:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I am still editing the content and the references are strong enough, the references are never done through press release. Eagle Hunters is only multinational company from India. Any activity and any change automatically becomes news. well still giving many references.....--Mykanah (talk) 08:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC) — Mykanah (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:51, 19 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes  13:35, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Comments - Amazingly there are a couple of sources that are suitable, but most relate to specific things rather than the actual company. Khalee Times does, though you have to strain our the multiple bits of interview to appreciate it. Without additional Sig Cov on the company itself then it doesn't currently pass WP:NCORP. I've not !voted, since I haven't yet taken the WP:BEFORE check outside of the article itself. I've broken it into three parts since my eyes were bad when reading the article and bleeding when reviewing the wikitext.
 * It is not impossible that this article breaches the line of advertising that would be justification in its own right for deletion - I'm unsure, but I would strongly advise Mykanah to tone it down.

Nosebagbear (talk) 21:48, 23 July 2018 (UTC) Sure I will follow it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mykanah (talk • contribs) 04:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 13:42, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete-Our subject notability guidelines require rigorous sourcing and this fails by a mile.For the sake of it, the Khaleej-Times piece can be safely discounted as a non-independent source (allmost all corp-interviews are; copy-paste from director's mouth and a promo-tone....). &#x222F; WBG converse 13:56, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NORG. What's the solution in the title refer to? Smallbones( smalltalk ) 03:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.