Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eagle Vision One (EV1)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. An option was proposed but not accepted: a new name, as OlYeller said, does not change the notability of the article as it stands. Drmies (talk) 04:36, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Eagle Vision One (EV1)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Seemingly non-notable company fails WP:GNG with no Google News search hits and no Google News Archive hits. I've gone through pages of a standard Google search and can't find any independent, significant, and reliable coverage. Also fails WP:CORP.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  15:00, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

This page is designed to get information out about Eagle Vision 1. If you do a search for Eagle Vision Military program it come up with numerous articles about the program. If just have to know where to look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.89.33.30 (talk) 15:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Is Eagle Vision a common term?  My real question is, is Eagle Vision independent of the company named Eagle Vision One?  This would be similar to a product being notable but not every company that uses it.  The link you provided shows several sources discussing Eagle Vision but none that discuss Eagle Vision One.  Ol Yeller21  Talktome  16:30, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Move to Eagle Vision (satellite system) or similar. While EV1 doesn't get much coverage, the system as a whole is notable. Journal articles News (and starbulletin.com stories which wouldn't load) Official military sources Misc NB Eagle Vision is entirely unrelated. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:34, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I think this is probably the best course of action.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  17:36, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Move and rescope per Colapeninsula - and posthaste, as the article as it is could reasonably be tagged for G11 speedy. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:39, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

I have no problem moving it or changeing the Name of the page. If it can be changed to "Eagle Vision One - EV1 (Commercial Satellite Imagery)" that would work best. Also tagging it as "G11 speedy" i think is uncalled for this is a military organization and there are many others on Wiki that read just like this one. If i could get some help on how to move the page that would be great.

NEW COMMENT: I recommend changing the name to "Eagle Vision One - EV1 (Commercial Imagery)." Before I wrote this, I Googled "Eagle Vision One" and its Wiki page was the 4th result. Bottom line: EV1 Commercial Imagery belongs on Wikipedia, but it should change its name to clarify who it is. I believe the page will get better over time. THANKS! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.3.25.68 (talk) 11:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

New Comment: I have added links with in the page to the other Units to which EV1 is attached. If there are further issues with the site could someone tell me how to fix this. EV1 is a military unit and if need be i can show several link to the proof of this unit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.l.sims (talk • contribs) 12:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

NEW COMMENT: Bottom line...What is required to fix this page? Should the title be changed?...What else? PLEASE just show / tell us what to do. THANK YOU! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.68.233.169 (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

NEW COMMENT: WE, EAGLE VISION ONE, RESPECTFULLY REQUEST HELP MOVING OUR PAGE TO "EAGLE VISION ONE (COMMERCIAL SATELLITE IMAGERY)." WE DONT HAVE ANY LOCAL EDITER THAT HAS THE 'MOVE / TAG' DROPDOWN ACCESS YET, BECAUSE WE ARE SO NEW TO WIKI. THANK YOU AGAIN. (I'm not screaming...just trying to get some help).

http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123089962 http://www.eucom.mil/article/21035/eagle-vision-wraps-portugal — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.l.sims (talk • contribs) 09:27, 16 April 2012 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)




 * I can move the site just do not want to have to start this whole process over again once it is moved. Please advise if it needs to be moved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.l.sims (talk • contribs) 12:18, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have moved the Page to Eagle Vision One (Commercial Satellite Imagery) — Preceding unsigned comment added by John.l.sims (talk • contribs) 12:29, 25 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - The issue isn't with the name of the article. The issue is comes with the apparent lack of notability of the company.  The system they use certainly seems notable but the company is not.  The merge/move !votes have been made to merge or move the information about the system to a new article, not move the article to a new name.  Ol Yeller21  Talktome  17:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   05:48, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.