Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ean Sugarman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. as a copyvio per Sarah  Sandstein   12:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Ean Sugarman

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:BIO and WP:MUSIC, the article makes numerous claims, most of which I cannot even verify as true. appears to be more an ad of this person. 3 hits in gnews. he may have had a role in mixing lots of singles but it appears to be only minor as there is no third party coverage of this. LibStar (talk) 01:24, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 02:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 01:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, there does appear to be some coverage of this person, although as the nominator has covered, if kept this article needs a good cleanout and improvement. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:37, 16 January 2010 (UTC).
 * Keep - as there seems to be some independent coverage, definitely enough for a stub. Pantherskin (talk) 14:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a blatant copyright violation of sugarmanmusic.com. Sarah 11:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.