Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl Dittman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Earl Dittman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability since 2010, appears to be only notable for movie reviews in 2005. Fails GNG IMO Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  12:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  12:37, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep and fix. Dittman is spoken of or quoted as a critic in multiple books and news sources... like a poor man's Roger Ebert. The project is served by this being better sourced, not by its deletion.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 12:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm  (T•C•G•E) 00:39, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have added some more sources to the article. Basically, the contrast between the frequency with which Dittman was quoted in movie ads and the obscurity of his work otherwise led to his receiving profiles in some reliable sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:38, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:06, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.