Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl Dixon (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:04, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Earl Dixon (musician)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable musician who fails WP:MUSIC and WP:ENTERTAINER. Looks to be promotional. Qworty (talk) 19:19, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete — Readily fails WP:GNG: current supporting sources are craptastic, and I didn't find much better on searching. WP:MUSICBIO, including criteria 6, is not met despite the existence of Wikipedia articles on two associated bands; there's no indication of notability among any two. JFHJr (㊟) 04:47, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 22:44, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 12:42, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete neither this article nor the related article Audesi seem to meet WP:GNG
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.