Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl Lennox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 06:46, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Earl Lennox

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a person whose most substantive claim of notability is as mayor of a municipality with a population of just 2K — not nearly large enough to grant an automatic presumption of notability to its mayors under WP:NPOL. The article, further, is written like a campaign brochure — how long he's been married to his wife, before you've even explained what he did to get into an encyclopedia? — and cites not a shred of reliable source coverage for anything in here. I was actually tempted to speedy it, but the article has somehow survived in this state since 2007. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 23:38, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  00:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete mayors of places with under 3,000 are almost never notable for this fact.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:07, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I certainly agree that the article does not show notability as a politician, and while I'm not terribly familiar with the sport, I don't think it meets WP:NHORSERACING either. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Ashbeckjonathan (talk) 20:36, 13 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.