Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earl S. Bell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 04:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Earl S. Bell

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Allthough the article is asthetically well done, it's little more than flashy self-promotion of a subject of questionable notability. None of the references make any mention of the subject, and most of the article is not about the person but about a proposed building design, an unnotable magazine, and a architectural style that was previously removed from wikipedia. 99DBSIMLR 18:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no *real* links to it. History shows that it is all self-promotion.  Reywas92 Talk Review me 20:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete a very well done example of advertising, but with no outside sources for reviews the subject is not notable. DGG 00:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.