Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earle Labor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Redwolf24 05:42, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

Earle Labor
not notable GangofOne
 * Keep Seems notable, just initially badly written. I expanded it a bit. –Mysid ( talk ) 07:09, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be a notable author. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:43, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Is notable Kewp 10:36, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Trollderella 01:24, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep now that you fixed it GangofOne 01:29, 17 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.