Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early Demos and Singles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Nakon 01:19, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Early Demos and Singles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage in reliable sources to verify or sustain an article. Fails general notability and WP:NALBUMS. Jbh (talk) 13:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep This is a notable Dethcentrik release. Depending of results of Dethcentrik's current AfD, this should either stay or be speedily deleted under A9. --BusyWikipedian (talk) 15:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note - — BusyWikipedian (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  Jbh (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Please read through my contribution history before making accusations -BusyWikipedian (talk) 15:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, when I looked at your contributions all I saw were edits related to Død Beverte who is a member of Dethcentrik and Død Incarnate Records including the Deathcentric albums which are not even remotly near passing WP:NALBUM. I should have looked deeper. Striking SPA and will do so at the other AfDs related to Deathcentric. Jbh (talk) 15:43, 8 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment To be specific WP:NALBUMS requires significant non-trivial coverage in RS. Having the album chart on a national chart (in the US that is one based on Nielson's Soundscan), be nominated for a major award (ie Grammy or equivalent) etc. Having an Allmusic track listing is not a source and a single video mention is not significant coverage. Jbh (talk) 22:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Nom is correct. The subject hasn't received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources so fails general notability and certainly doesn't meet any of the special criteria for albums at WP:NALBUMS. I disagree with notion that this article should not be deleted if the Dethcentrik article is not deleted, it just doesn't work that way. The subject is not notable and article fails our need for verifiability.- Metal lunchbox (talk) 16:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.