Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early Earth Federation mobile suits in the Gundam universe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Mobile Weapons in Gundam. Owen&times; &#9742;  13:34, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Early Earth Federation mobile suits in the Gundam universe

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This list simply seems to be a more specialised and crufty version of List of Mobile Weapons in Gundam. While "Mobile Weapons in Gundam" may be notable enough to have a list devoted to it, the same can hardly be said for "Early Earth Federation Mobile Suits in Gundam". Anthem of joy (talk) 11:14, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think we would have this level of detail about real products, much less imaginary weapon systems. Belongs on a fan site, although I appreciate the work that went into the article. Kitfoxxe (talk) 12:10, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is WP:FANCRUFT - simply a list of imaginary weapons systems, and belongs on a fandom wiki somewhere else. --Whiteguru (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete the kind of thing that fits WP:GAMEGUIDE but I understand that there are only a few game adaptations of gundam. Still, it has all the other features of game guide material that make it inappropriate for Wikipedia: it's WP:JUSTPLOT, with little information about significance or reception to WP:verify notability. And even if there was, it wouldn't justify a complete exposition of details of every single weapon in the series. As a general rule, Wikipedia is not really a place to have exhaustive lists of weapons in fiction. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:26, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I had copied over some of the content from this list into other lists about specific series. But it has been a couple of years ago and I don't remember which of the UC series lists I copied some of the information to. While this may be a poorly constructed list with too much unnecessary information, it cannot be deleted per CC and GFDL requirements to maintain credit. As to what exactly to do with this list, I'm not entirely sure. Perhaps turning it into a navigational list. —Farix (t &#124; c) 02:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons given above. Though if things like the Pepsi marketing release aren't mentioned elsewhere, those could be moved to other articles. Maybe bung the reference links over to Gundam's talk page before deletion, in case editors there want to incorporate them. Polenth (talk) 03:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect—though I agree with the rationales provided above, the list may not be deleted per CC and GFDL. I presume to List of Mobile Weapons in Gundam might be a suitable target, if expanded somewhat? G.A.S talk 04:35, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - so it's not currently possible to delete this content because it serves as authorship attribution for other articles ? Shouldn't there be talk page tags signfying this ? --Anthem of joy (talk) 06:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Talk page tags denoting this kind of content movement only came into use relatively recently. --Malkinann (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per GAS. -- 43?9enter ☭ ★  06:47, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per GAS, as this list cannot be deleted. --Malkinann (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per WP:CHEAP. Anthem of joy (talk) 10:03, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.