Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early Gnosticism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Gnosticism. czar ⨹   17:10, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Early Gnosticism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No source since 2007 and irrelevant article since Christian Gnosticism & Gnosticism already exist, also, failed WP:GNG grounds. JudeccaXIII (talk) 04:13, 19 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - not sure about this one. There are plenty of sources that talk about "early Gnosticism" but they don't directly relate to what this article purports to cover. It's not really clear exactly what this article would cover, were it to cover anything properly, or whether such an article would be made redundant by the articles Christian Gnosticism and Gnosticism. There are plenty of sources for Pre-Christian Gnosticism which we don't have an article for but this wouldn't seem to be that either. Interested to see what others have to say.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 05:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Merge to Gnosticism. Artw (talk) 17:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing here is sourced or worth keeping or merging. --Michig (talk) 14:23, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:06, 27 December 2014 (UTC) not
 * Delete and redirect to Gnosticism per nominators argument that the topic is already covered and this is not referenced, but it is also a possible search term worth redirecting.  JT dale Talk ~ 03:51, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.