Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early Renaissance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep, anyone can merge it as an editorial decision at their leisure. - Bobet 13:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Early Renaissance
redundant article, contains no new information, see Renaissance Benji64 18:47, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Possibly add a redirect to Renaissance, or Italian Renaissance. --Porqin 19:28, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I disagree, it should not be simply deleted with a redirect. --HResearcher 03:16, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep The article doesn't add much, but there's an immense amount of room for someone to expand upon it. This to me is exactly the sort of thing that stubs are for. Vickser 02:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Renaissance, when someone does expand the section to a point where it can stand on its own, it can be split off. At this point, the small amount of information in this stub would be more at home in the main article. -- Wine Guy  Talk  22:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect immediately – No controversy is there? It was on my todo list for a while, I was just about to do it, but I'll wait now until a decision is reached here. The person who started this poll would have saved himself and all of us time by being bold. There is too much talk at wikipedia and too little action. Piet 14:03, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree with Vickser, or as Wine Guy suggests, merge to renaissance and later (when it has expanded enough) it can be moved to it's own article. --HResearcher 03:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.