Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early in the Morning: A Collection of New Poems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:21, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Early in the Morning: A Collection of New Poems

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Book of childrens' poetry that doesn't appear to meet WP:NBOOK. While the article has a link showing that the book won an asward, there's nothing that convinces me the aware itself is notable, and therefore I don't believe the "award-winning" criteria of WP:NBOOK is met. Mikeblas (talk) 18:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. (t)  Josve05a  (c) 19:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. (t)  Josve05a  (c) 19:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:50, 5 December 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07  ( T ) 02:09, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:56, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 06:10, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Charles Causley and it may be best to simply delete unless anyone wants this saved for future uses, as my searches simply found nothing better and I'm not currently seeing how this can become a better article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  08:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.