Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early literacy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was TRANSWIKI, with some retention as either a redirect or a stub. Hmmm. Well, I personally prefer the redirect since the tone of the first 3 sentences at the moment is faintly embarassing, but that's an entirely editorial decision. -Splash talk 19:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Early literacy

 * How-to giude--Weak bad 07:04, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Someone had made it a redirect to Children's literature, which was inappropriate while this discussion was going on, but is possibly not a bad idea until a less how-to style article is written. JPD (talk) 14:09, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Transwiki to Wikibooks. It's quite good, just not an encyclopaedia article. Stifle 13:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Concur with transwiki Alba 21:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks! Deathphoenix' 17:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * transwiki but keep' a stub. (first 3 sentences and the references) Kappa 13:45, 25 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.