Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early scholars of Islam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Early scholars of Islam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:CONTENTFORK of History of Islam and its various subarticles. Merging to elsewhere does not seem necessary, since obvious targets like History of Islam and its subarticles already cover the content. The article is also a WP:SYNTHESIS of the histories of various scholars important Muslims from an undefined "early" period. If we're going to keep this however, where do we draw the line? Which scholars and what part of history can be part of the page? HyperGaruda (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. HyperGaruda (talk) 22:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Most of the article is pasted from Fiqh, History of Islam, and (bizarrely) Safavid dynasty or a related article, while the rest is WP:OR. Eperoton (talk) 22:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * delete per the above. content fork, and large chunks of OR to boot. Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.