Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth-349


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-30 09:29Z 

Earth-349

 * — (View AfD)

Promotion for a non-notable fictional universe. The article creator's name is the same as the name of the author of these works. FreplySpang 00:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC) So, let me see: this should be deleted because it's not "notable" enough? Well, sorry I wasted your time, folks: I didn't know Wikipedia had already become so elitist. -- Dr. Psycho (the one and only)
 * Delete fancruft and per nom. Danny Lilithborne 00:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable fancruft. TSO1D 01:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Public domain means delete! &laquo;TTV&raquo; (talk|contribs|email) 02:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete because it's non-notable. Jyothisingh 03:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fancruft, fails WP:TRIV WP:OR WP:NOT and per FreplySpang. GCFreak2 06:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - vanispamcruftisement which was made up one day. MER-C 07:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete I only got 206 or so google hits without refining my search at all, besides that, it is completely unwikified and I think it would be waste of time bothering to make it so. Besides that, it's total fancruft. TehKewl1 09:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fancruft, WP:VSCA. Ter e nce Ong 09:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable fanfiction -- Whpq 16:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Jorcoga † 01:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per nom. ← A NAS  Talk? 01:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Completely non-notable. And I agree, the close similarity of the creator to the name in the article is highly suspicious.  This could possible fall under  and definitely violates WP:COI --Sbrools ( talk  .  contribs ) 03:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Userify so as to avoid WP:BITE. CRGreathouse (t | c) 09:53, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.