Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earth (6th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, per WP:STICK, without prejudice against speedy renomination, erm, a year today. Deryck C. 17:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Earth
AfDs for this article:
 * Articles for deletion/Earth
 * Articles for deletion/Earth (2nd nomination)
 * Articles for deletion/Earth (3rd nomination)
 * Articles for deletion/Earth (4th nomination)
 * Articles for deletion/Earth (5th nomination)
 * Articles for deletion/Earth (6th nomination)
 * Articles for deletion/Earth (7th nomination)
 * – ( View AfD View log )

All editors have a conflict of interest. Six Sided Pun Vows (talk &#124; contribs &#124; former account) 01:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Mildly neutral Keep, with strong admissions of WP:COI. After all, that's where I keep all of my stuff! -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:34, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm moving to another planet. Bulldog73 talk da contribs  go rando 01:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Very weak keep, because Bulldog73 doesn't give a rat's ass - thus invalidating the opening argument. -- Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 01:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious conflict of interest because the article was written by residents of the planet. If we can get some aliens to write it… Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Abstain Only aliens have the right to nominate this article for deletion. We humans can't delete this due to pressing COI issues (but then again, why did we create this article anyway?) Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable rock, only 1,420,000,000 search results. WikiPuppies! (bark) 02:11, 1 April 2012 (UTC) — WikiPuppies (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Very strong delete, article can never qualify as third party sources can never be found. Obvious  conflict of interest as article was written by inhabitants of this planet. Definitely original research. Clearly fails WP: NASTRO as nobody not living on this planet has ever bothered to write about it. Why do we even have articles on this stuff?  C h r o m a Nebula   (talk)   02:17, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Very strong keep, Earth has notable landforms and speicies of animals and strange things called humans, therefore it's notable. Scientific Alan 2 (talk) 02:22, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Bring the banhammer down on nom for failing to provide an original prank.--The Devil&#39;s Advocate (talk) 02:24, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - The only way this can be NPOV if it was written by aliens.  Dough 48  72  02:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and rewrite Probably notable, but the article's way too long. The whole thing could probably be summed up in two words. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 03:13, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep and revisit after winter solstice &mdash; Presenting a truly NPOV may be difficult or impossible, but this planet's timeline is chiseled in stone for the time being. __ Just plain Bill (talk) 03:51, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable fictional setting of many movies. What a pro (talk, contribs) is on fire.  07:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Written from human supremacist, animal-phobic, planetary jingoistic POV, as if the humans are owner of this planet and because of those humans, this planet is superior to others. Delete this inflammatory propaganda. -- Supernova Explosion   Talk  11:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. The nominator assumes without reason that all editors are from Earth.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:05, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Where are you from? -- Supernova Explosion   Talk  12:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I think you are getting too personal. I will reveal that I derive from the same supernova explosion as this local environment.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's mostly harmless. &#42;Dan T.* (talk) 12:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment – It's going to be deleted anyways when it ends on December 21, 2012. --MuZemike 15:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's only a minor location in an infinite universe. 50.104.52.200 (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Ridiculous level of Listcruft. The article creators seem to have decided their pet topic should have the sum of all human knowledge plugged in to make it look more impressive, including links to pretty much every other major topic on Wikipedia.  Sorry guys, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information -Markeer 16:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 *  Destroy to make way for an intergalactic spaceway Delete. In order to meed WP:NPOV, we would have to prove that all the users who contributed to this article are aliens, which I doubt. StringTheory11 16:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.