Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earthsong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep and merge it is then! Fram (talk) 09:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Earthsong

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This webcomic does not appear to meet the notability criteria listed at WP:WEB. Specifically, evidence does not appear to presented within the article that "the content itself has been the subject of 'multiple' non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself" (emphasis mine). Whether the publishing of this webcomic by Seven Seas Entertainment qualifies it as being "distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators" is unclear. Robin S (talk) 12:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions.   — Cliff smith  talk  15:58, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the author's article for deletion, because she is not notable except for the webcomic:




 * Keep and merge per WP:N and WP:V. Merge the author's article into the publication's article. The webcomic is also a book, published by a mainstream publisher: Seven Seas is an imprint of Macmillan, acquired as part of their expansion into graphic novels as noted in Publisher's Weekly.  The book has been reviewed by at least a couple independent sites.  The author though is not notable other than for this book and webcomic, therefore the author's article should be merged and redirected to the book's article. For accomplishing the merge, there is very little content in the author's article, it could be placed directly into the book's article as  a section, or placed on the talk page of the book's article for editors to integrate whatever of it is not duplicated info.  --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 03:23, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wizardman  15:21, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep and merge per above. JulesH (talk) 21:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  JForget  23:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep and merge per above. Hiding T 09:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- Hiding T 09:16, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.