Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East 304

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Stormie 08:57, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)

East 304
Vanity. --fvw *  08:31, 2005 Jan 24 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. Not notable. jni 08:51, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity.   &mdash; Asbestos | Talk 11:48, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, A gang of 7 isn't notable. Inter 11:53, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete street gangs are inherently not notable unless they make news. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 13:42, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 23:38, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete, East 304 will kick your ass if this page is deleted.
 * They're certainly welcome to try, O Talking Hosiery. Delete this one as well as the Captain Groovy article.  On my way to vote on that one. - Lucky 6.9 18:21, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete If the purpose of the encyclopedia is to collect information about as many different aspects of the world as possible, to delete this page (which is not profane or libelous) would set a precedent dangerous to the aspirations of Wikipedia. ElScorcho717 [No such user exists --fvw * ]
 * Wikipedia is not a general knowledge database. Megan1967 00:42, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Um, how can you say I don't exist as a user if I am editing this page as ElScorcho717 right now?