Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Asia Climate Partnership


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  12:15, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

East Asia Climate Partnership

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article has few citations, all of which are broken so information cannot be verified. Seems like it will be impossible to update as there is no recent information on this topic - there is no independent coverage of the Partnership, and the only information I can find on it was last updated in 2009. As such, I feel the article doesn't meet notability criteria, and there is no info available to update it to meet quality/accuracy criteria.  OliverEastwood  talk  12:48, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Korea.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:48, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I fixed source #2 by adding an archive link, but translating archived pages is not possible so I cannot read it. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 02:32, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:59, 21 October 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:28, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Asia and South Korea.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  17:24, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Oppose. Searching for it in Korean ("동아시아기후파트너십") shows numerous respectable independent sources covering it. It's unfortunate the article is poorly sourced though; it needs some work but I think it's a notable enough topic. (I probably won't do the work) toobigtokale (talk) 02:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.