Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Coast Coalition for Tolerance and Non-Discrimination


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

East Coast Coalition for Tolerance and Non-Discrimination

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article was created by mostly single purpose accounts as a lot of the significant contributors are new accounts who have contributed to either this page or other pages that links to this page (such as the page for their founder which was since been deleted). Although paid/COI editing is not immediate grounds for deletion, this does seem like WP:PROMO and I am nominating this for article per WP:ORGIND as the only coverage not from event pages, primary sources, or other student organizations is from the same Sing Tao article in English and in Chinese. There is a brief mention in a local FOX tv station but that hardly counts towards WP:SIGCOV. BriefEdits (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak delete. It seems like it does exist and is at least somewhat notable, with a pretty expansive reach, but the article's big concern for me (aside from the good ol' complete lack of proper citations) is that promotional tone. AdoTang (talk) 15:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - There are a few sources, but I'm not so sure it amounts to WP:ORG. Possibly just too soon. Sounds like they're doing some good work and the founder has some good ambitions, but perhaps not yet for a Wikipedia article. There's some coverage about their activity to repeat 50-a, which is mentioned in that article to an extent likely sufficient. If people find some really good sources which provide in-depth coverage, I'd like to see them. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 18:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:16, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom--Steamboat2020 (talk) 13:40, 11 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.