Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Guhuan Island


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  00:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

East Guhuan Island

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Challenged for inline citations and more sources since 2020. Other sources that I found in GBooks only proves that it exists but that's it. Alternatively, redirect to List_of_islands_of_the_Philippines. Lenticel ( talk ) 00:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Philippines and Islands.  Lenticel  ( talk ) 00:31, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
 * According to https://geonames.nga.mil/gn-ags/rest/services/RESEARCH/GIS_OUTPUT/MapServer/0/query?outFields=*&where=ufi+%3D+-2401696 and maps that show boundaries, this is in Malaysia, not the Philippines, but I couldn't find anything significant. Peter James (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment  it seems to be part of British Borneo (see here). Now this is a rabbit hole you might want to look up in the future but for now it is indeed currently in Malaysian hands. -- Lenticel  ( talk ) 06:34, 10 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment I struck down my redirect suggestion given that this island might be no longer part of the Philippines in the first place -- Lenticel ( talk ) 06:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: can't find much meaningful info on it (but I don't know Malaysian, so I can't do a search in that language), likely fails WP:NGEO. More problematic is that this article seems to be totally wrong, based on one outdated source, and is copied to many other wikis. Best to blow it up. --  P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:53, 10 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.