Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Sussex Youth Cabinet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 21:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

East Sussex Youth Cabinet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A youth group that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Currently, the only sources being used in the article are from the group's own websites. I did some searches to look for any additional sources, and while it does pop up as being mentioned here and there, nothing I found would be considered significant coverage. I initially PRODed this, but it turns out that there had been a contested PROD on this page previously, making ineligible to be PRODed now, so I am bringing it here. Rorshacma (talk) 16:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 16:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Politics.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ORG. A mere 2 gnews hits. LibStar (talk) 04:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that WP:NORG isn't met. There are a few brief articles in the local press (e.g. and ), but per WP:AUD some sort of sigcov from regional/national sources (at minimum) is needed. No possible alternatives to deletion come to mind. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.