Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East Timor–Israel relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that this meets GNG (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 05:59, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

East Timor–Israel relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. There isn't much to this relationship besides diplomatic recognition and one leader visit. LibStar (talk) 08:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. North America1000 08:48, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Keep No valid reason given for deletion. If Israel has diplomatic relations with a country, and solid sources have been provided for all the information, even if there is not much, the article has value.--Geewhiz (talk) 10:35, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * valid reason that it fails WP:GNG. Having little relations does not equate to a notable relations. Have you actually searched for third party sources? LibStar (talk) 10:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If you're going to claim be providing a policy-based rationale for these serial AfDs, you should probably read the policy you cite. Of course, all Wikipedia policies are merely a means to an end, so it would be better to explain how you believe deleting these articles will support Wikipedia's WP:PURPOSE of making available "the sum of all human knowledge." -- Visviva (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per Gilabrand. -- Visviva (talk) 18:21, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:PERX. LibStar (talk) 16:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Next-to-no relations between the two. Not everything that is true and verifiable is noteworthy. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The lack of relations is itself notable! brew crewer  (yada, yada) 20:46, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * That means I'm notable for my lack of notability too. Where's my article? Clarityfiend (talk) 20:51, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Except I did not say it is notable for lack of notability. Reading more carefully would avoid these types of misunderstandings.  brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 23:00, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep sufficient sources exist per WP:GNG--TM 16:19, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Since Israel is by no means a "banana republic," and is a nation recognised by the world community at large, although it has "uneasy" relations with its Arab and Muslim neighbours, it is still a nation to be reckoned with. It is of special interest and value whenever good diplomatic relations are shared between Israel and the respective states represented by the UN.Davidbena (talk) 16:49, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Per above. Clearly worth including on Wikipedia and meets GNG. Ambrosiawater (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.