Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastbourne Arndale Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No sources apart from the centre's website. Mention might be warranted in Eastbourne, but there seems to be nothing to merge. Shimeru (talk) 21:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Eastbourne Arndale Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable shopping center. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC) Being both the largest shopping centre/mall in Eastbourne and one of the largest in East Sussex, I think that there are sufficient reasons for this article to remain? Deanybabeh (talk) 06:28, 10 April 2010 (UTC) Also, does this not make it notable enough to remain on Wikipedia? Deanybabeh (talk) 06:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:10, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge (pruning severaly) to the town centre section of Eastbourne whose town centre it is part of. I think the consensus is that shopping centres are NN, the exception in Britain being half a dozen free-standing developemnts such as Bluewater, Merry Hill and Trafford.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:56, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've not seen any consensus that shopping malls are automatically considered "NN." Some are small and have had scant secondary coverage, but many are kept. --Oakshade (talk) 02:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 16:33, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * What are notability criteria for malls? DS (talk) 13:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.