Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easter Eggs in Grand Theft Auto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:47, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Easter Eggs in Grand Theft Auto

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Completely in-universe; essentially a guide to finding Easter eggs, which is one of the things Wikipedia is not for. I'm sure eeggs.com or some other wiki will gladly take such a list though. Wafulz (talk) 18:16, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * delete - unless there is some kind of third party reference for it. I did reform the article so I can at least read it.  Mostly not even true 'easter eggs' but comments on links from previous versions of the game.  --Rocksanddirt (talk) 18:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NOT (plot summaries, manual or guidebook, original research). --B. Wolterding (talk) 18:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 19:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of the "easter eggs", rely on the user finding them (original research) or are highly subjective. Thus should be deleted, unless reliable sources are found that comment on the "easter eggs". Nan oha A's Yu ri     Talk, My master 20:11, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:GAMEGUIDE. ArcAngel (talk) (Review) 20:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia isn't a game guide. RobJ1981 (talk) 20:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article adds undue weight to an unnotable topic. Possibly a merge into the series article would be apprpriate,or maybe a transwiki to a suitable gaming wiki. Gazimoff Write Read 23:39, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Theres a section in Electronic Gaming Monthly about easter eggs in GTA, you can probably make a decent article using that source. But its still fancruft and should not be on Wikipedia. -- Coasttocoast (talk) 01:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NOT. Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 04:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete unencyclopedic even though I love easter eggs. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 05:58, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above.Jasynnash2 (talk) 08:49, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete Nothing but OR. WikiKingOfMishawaka (talk) 16:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.