Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern Eye (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  08:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Eastern Eye
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Don't have enough sources, fails WP:GNG Princepratap1234 (talk) 06:44, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:22, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:22, 16 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added some references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment The previous deletion discussion for this article title was for a different subject (an Australian film distributor, a label of Madman Entertainment). At that time of that discussion, this article was at the title Eastern Eye (newspaper).  I presumably created this article by extracting the content from the other one.—Ketil Trout (&lt;&gt;&lt;!) 09:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's the sources that exist that count, not just those already cited in the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Strongly Keep. Widely known media in Northeastern part of India. I was about to remove deletion template but discussion is in progress I would recommend to keep it.-- 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 06:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.