Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastern Quay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Eastern Quay

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Apartment building in London which doesn't look notable. It is claimed the building won "various awards", but the only one in the sources given  was actually for the project manager. I couldn't find references for any other awards, or any significant independent coverage. the wub "?!"  20:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and England. the wub  "?!"  20:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Can't pass WP:GNG if any buildings in London are not notable. CastJared (talk) 21:07, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * your deletion rationale doesn’t make sense. Can you explain please? Mccapra (talk) 21:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It's because if any buildings in London are not notable, It can pass by editing it or suggest delete. CastJared (talk) 21:43, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I’m sorry but that doesn’t make sense either. Clearly there are many buildings in London that are notable and already have articles. If this article can pass by editing then it should not be deleted. Mccapra (talk) 03:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete: fails WP:GNG greyzxq  talk 21:40, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Haven't come across anything that suggests this apartment block is notable. Makes it difficult to evaluate without proper sourcing. Will reconsider if sources are found, but without firm evidence I feel this doesn't pass the GNG. Rupples (talk) 03:35, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.