Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastgate Parkway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus  DGG ( talk ) 07:58, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Eastgate Parkway

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability in line with WP:GNG; the assertion that this is a "major parkway" fails compared to the reality of what is actually shown on a map.  Imzadi 1979  →   17:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as non notable park parkway, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC) (Updated 23:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC))
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete it's not a "park" it's a "parkway" - which is to say, a road. And while Streetview isn't available for this area, zooming in on Gmaps does show it to be a very brief divided parkway. And while Google Maps shows it to bear the number 17 it is not connected in any sense to Ontario Highway 17. So per WP:GEOROAD it's still going to need to pass GNG, which it does not. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:15, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Oops sorry not sure why I'd put park, Amended. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:45, 15 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Every arterial road that exists in every city is not automatically a candidate for an unreferenced standalone article just because it exists — a road can qualify for an article if enough reliable source coverage exists about it to get it over WP:GNG, but there's no automatic "just because it can be seen on a map" presumption of notability for roads. No such coverage is shown here, however. Note also Tomken Rd, which was created by the same user at the same time and actually pulls off the neat trick of saying even less about its subject than this does — it's already been tagged for prod, but will have to be monitored and possibly listed for full AFD as well if the template gets removed. Bearcat (talk) 00:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication of notability. Fails WP:GNG. -- Kinu  t/c 17:29, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable local road.  Sounder Bruce  00:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.