Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastleigh Baptist Church


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:Phantomsteve as copyvio. NAC. Bridgeplayer (talk) 02:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Eastleigh Baptist Church

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable church. My speedy deletion tag was removed. Woogee (talk) 23:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources to indicate notability. Also, probably a cut & paste copyvio of the church's home page. Studerby (talk) 00:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as copyvio. The best way to get minor churches included in Wikipedia is to redirect to the town and mention the church there. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 08:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - needs improvement not deletion. Jeni  ( talk ) 10:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * What provisions of WP:ORG does it meet? Are all churches by default notable?  Woogee (talk) 20:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete NN church C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 22:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into Eastleigh, as Chris Neville-Smith has said this is usually the best solution for local churches, primary schools, village halls and the like. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:55, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * speedy Delete as a copyvio from http://www.eastleighbaptist.org.uk/ and tagged as such. -- Whpq (talk) 19:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.