Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastside Educational Trust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Eastside Educational Trust

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Originally CSD by which I declined  on grounds of significant claims to notability. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:38, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I'm not finding substantially better myself and I still note what I said with my tagging summary: "Nothing actually salvageable, see "introduce children of all ages to the arts and literature in London and to raise young people's standards of achievement in language, literacy and artistic endeavour by unlocking the creative potential in everyone". The advert-like concerns here are enough to delete alone, since it's all focused with PR, the sources are certainly not any better including their own source-listed websites. SwisterTwister   talk  05:40, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:14, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * delete, sadly - they feel like they should be notable, but I've found nothing non-primary to base an article on. All seven GNews hits are passing mentions - David Gerard (talk) 08:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.