Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EasyMoney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

EasyMoney

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reviewed under new page patrol. No indication of wp:notability under wp:GNG or SNG. This is a product of a company. I would have merged myself but more eyes on this edge case would be good. Of the two sources, one is a website which does a pretty thorough review. The other is a link to their own website. I did a quick search and found little more. Suggest a merge into the company's article. North8000 (talk) 12:22, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies,  and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 12:40, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I have added extra references. easyMoney (a trading name of E-money Capital Ltd) is no longer owned by easyGroup according to Companies House and therefore should not be re-merged into the easyGroup article. easyGroup is not a regular conglomerate, but a branded venture capitalist which licences its name out to the various operating companies, some of which it only part owns (like easyJet) or does not own at all anymore (such as easyMoney).
 * LRB2000 (talk) LRB2000 (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Weak Keep there are partly routine and partly significant coverage in media. --Bash7oven (talk) 07:36, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * also, the suggestion of a merge is not valid anymore, as the company doesn't belong to easyGroup anymore. Bash7oven (talk) 07:42, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. Seems to pass WP:SIGCOV based on the cited references. Absent a source analysis, I don't see a compelling deletion argument being made.4meter4 (talk) 01:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.