Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Listening Satanic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 10:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Easy Listening Satanic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notability under our general notability guidelines I'm finding no reliable third-party sources discussing this new musical genre, and only one recording act is showing up as a performer of this genre - an act that matches the name of the author of this article. I wish the genre innovator success in finding performers to join him in this genre, and building it to the point where it gets the attention he wants for it, but Wikipedia is the tail end of that process, not the start. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. If there were reliable third-party sources, we'd need to nuke the article anyways. smileguy91talk - contribs 16:04, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing worth saving even if it was a notable topic, which it isn't. --Michig (talk) 16:11, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

There are Hymnbooks for Easy Listening Satanic available. I recommend The Reynoldsian Hymnal Vol. I at www.amazon.com/The-Reynoldsian-Hymnal-Vol-I/dp/1475040717 in addition to various hymnbooks and readings which may be found at lulu.com and typing in the reynoldsian hymnbook which will allow you to find volume 2. By typing in The Reverend and Dr. Robert Allen LaVey Reynolds into lulu.com you will find 31 books, some of which are filled with Easy Listening Satanic music.

I have a question. If all else fails can I be remembered as the Father of this genre again?

The Reverend
 * Your books do not qualify as third-party sources; you're the first party in this case. And as for who gets remembered as the Father of the genre: we don't have the ability to write the future here. Time will tell. --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:57, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

I was the first one to ask for it though wasn't I? Will that be forgotten?
 * Delete per nom's rationale. --Lockley (talk) 05:14, 6 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.