Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Redmine (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. The consensus is Keep, including a change of opinion by the nominator. Liz Read! Talk! 02:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Easy Redmine (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable software fails WP:GNG. Note that this appears to be distinct from Redmine, which does have coverage. Open to redirect as WP:ATD, but is not mentioned at target page (and I can't find WP:SIGCOV of Easy Redmine in relation to Redmine, so I would consider a mention WP:UNDUE) A412 (Talk &bull; C) 00:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Management, Internet,  and Software.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  01:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I couldn't understand the rationale behind 'fails WP:GNG'. First three sources referenced in the article would normally be sufficient to meet it:
 * https://forbes.cz/miliardu-ale-pomalu-jak-cech-ktery-premysli-jinak-dostal-svuj-software-do-celeho-sveta/
 * https://cc.cz/hlavni-software-statni-spravy-kazachstanu-je-z-ceska-firma-easy-software-se-nenapadne-rozprostrela-po-svete/
 * https://komoraplus.cz/2022/03/11/vyzkum-odhalil-trendy-managementu-na-dalku/
 * Is there an implied concern of these sources not being sufficiently reliable or independent? PaulT2022 (talk) 00:55, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have WP:INDEPENDENT and WP:SIGCOV concerns. Several of the sources (in particular the two Forbes cites) lean heavily interview, and the first link feels like a CEO profile. More importantly, the bulk of the WP:RS coverage doesn't actually discuss Easy Redmine. I think we'd be able to write a WP:V article on Easy Software the company, or on CEO Filip Morávek, but RS says precious little about Easy Redmine aside from that it exists, this company develops it, and some companies in other countries use it. A412 (Talk &bull; C) 04:10, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * That's a good point. I'd support a move to Easy Software unless someone comes up with a reason to suspect that the facts about the company are false.
 * WP:INDEPENDENT is a lesser concern in my view, as it's plausible that local media would like the story of worldwide success and produce coverage like this without improper influence. PaulT2022 (talk) 05:42, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Keep the software is notable due to its coverage in independent international and Czech sources like Businessinsider, Forbes, CzechCrunch, and Komora Plus. The software has a global reach, being available in 80 countries, and is used for instance by the Kazakh state administration, that highlights its notability in project management. I don't object the renaming of the page too. I have also found additional good coverage in several notable books ana PCmag about Easy Redmine and addded it to the page. ThanX yall (talk) 10:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Keep due to its significant recognition in the software industry, as evidenced by references from reputable sources like Biztweet.eu, Czechstartups.org, and Computerwoche.de. It represents a notable innovation in project management software, extending the functionalities of Redmine and offering unique features like advanced user management and dynamic project planning. The software's global expansion, including its market influence in Japan, and its mention in academic research, such as the thesis from there, further underline its relevance. Additionally, its contribution to the open-source community and practical application in various businesses demonstrate its wide-ranging impact and justify its presence on Wikipedia. --Loewstisch (talk) 14:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Keep as I see new sources, reviews and books were found, and the local Czech are quite good for general notability. --Old-AgedKid (talk) 14:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment from nom: New Czech-language sources look good. Leaning keep. A412 (Talk &bull; C) 20:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.