Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easycwmp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:22, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Easycwmp

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None of the sources prove that this product meets the WP:GNG. The article creator is also the developer and has been unable to supply any reliable in depth independent coverage to prove the notability. This is an effort by the company to include its product on Wikipedia. There are no claims to significance in the article. Domdeparis (talk) 16:28, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:33, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 03:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find any secondary sources, no professional reviews, only reviews are personal. Article fails notability guidelines.  - Pmedema (talk) 03:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking high-quality, independent RS refs. Refs provided are company sources and blogs. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.