Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EatAds


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bishonen &#124; talk 11:53, 24 January 2014 (UTC).

EatAds

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:CORP. created by an editor who has only worked on this article and the related business Dropmysite. LibStar (talk) 15:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete – No real indication of importance. The edit summary used in the page creation hints at using Wikipedia for possible advertising or promotion (I've seen it with other articles). United States Man (talk) 17:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero  &#124;  My Talk  05:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Open and shut case of promotion.LM2000 (talk) 06:12, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - software company of unclear notability; provided refs are PR, company sites, or blogs, typically just quoting company comments, not significant RS coverage. A search did not reveal additional RS coverage. As above, possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 23:19, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I cannot find any material to support notability. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.