Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eat Them!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ben · Salvidrim!   &#9993;  15:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Eat Them!

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A nothingburger of an article. Appears to fail WP:GNG. Coin945 (talk) 01:50, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 02:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 02:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Obviously you haven't bothered to check for sources for this one. Topic clear meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. It has widespread coverage from reliable secondary sources. In one minute I found web reviews from VideoGamer.com, GamesRadar, IGN, Eurogamer, GameSpot, GameZone; and print reviews from Official PlayStation Magazine UK, GamesMaster, Play, Edge, Official PlayStation Magazine US. --The1337gamer (talk) 17:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep There's are enough sources to pass WP:GNG. The reviews of GameSpot and that of GameZone do show that. In addition to sources provided above. –Ammarpad (talk) 03:06, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I know the article has had references added, but that clearly shows it passes WP:GNG Lee Vilenski(talk) 16:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.