Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebase Xi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:36, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Ebase Xi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article about non-notable product. A Google search revealed no independent in-depth coverage by reliable sources (just a few passing mentions and unreliable/promotional reviews). GermanJoe (talk) 16:03, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 16:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete I found nothing good, either. Rhadow (talk) 23:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 18:36, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Software used by 30% of UK public sector. Several hundred customer's worldwide. In production since 1999, new release V5.3.1 in September 2017. Extended with major cloud PaaS offering following $2m investment. The software may not be referenced widely on the web but by any normal standard it is notable. Dbrawlins 14:30, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The 'normal standard' on wikipedia is Notability which has not been met. Do you have an independent (non-company or PR) reference for the use by 30% of UK public sector claim?Dialectric (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.