Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eben Pagan (businessman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:07, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Eben Pagan (businessman)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject appears to be a non-notable businessman. There are some press releases and passing mentions, but I'm not seeing anything that establishes notability either under WP:GNG or WP:BIO. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 06:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 06:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 06:32, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)


 * delete. Seems promotional to me. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 14:52, 1 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete promotional article for businessman who falls short of GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:PROMOTION Wm335td (talk) 19:52, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Based on the current article and some quick research on Pagan he is a large part of a pyramid scheme and contains enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. Added information on the business group/pyramid scheme to the page. Comb4ckszn (talk) 18:07, 4 November 2019 (UTC) — Comb4ckszn (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep Have you seen teh page for The Syndicate. Pagan is trying to whitewash his name with this crap. Ignores MLM and FTC investigations of him, which I'll update the page with right now.  Not sure why several SPA accounts are all suddenly so interested in deleting this page.   65.190.31.78 (talk) 12:02, 5 November 2019 (UTC) — 65.190.31.78 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment If that's the case then it is likely a case of WP:BIO1E. The syndicate itself seems to be of dubious notability given the current sourcing of the article. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. Fails WP:GNG. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete coverage is passing at best of this ordinary business writer; no accomplishments of note. Bearian (talk) 01:41, 7 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.